Architecture and reliability review
How the system is put together, where it will break under growth, and which coupling will make the next change disproportionately expensive.
A technical audit answers one question honestly: what will hurt, in what order, and what will it cost to fix. We review architecture, code, infrastructure and delivery, then hand over a ranked list you can act on — or show an investor.
Security · DX · Scalability
We are about to commit to a rewrite and we want a second opinion first.
An investor is asking technical questions we cannot answer with confidence.
We inherited a codebase and nobody can tell us how bad it actually is.
How the system is put together, where it will break under growth, and which coupling will make the next change disproportionately expensive.
Not a linter report. Where the debt is concentrated, what it costs per feature, and which parts are safe to leave alone — because not all debt is worth repaying.
Authentication, authorisation, secret handling, dependency exposure and data flows, mapped against the obligations you actually carry.
Build times, test coverage where it matters, environment setup and release process — the operational drag that slows a team without showing up in any ticket.
The same review framed for a non-engineering audience: risk, key-person dependency, scalability and remediation cost, in language a fund can act on.
Tell us what decision is coming up and what you are unsure about. We reply within a day with a proposed scope and timeline.
Send us a short description of what you're building or what's broken. We'll reply within a day with honest thoughts on scope, approach, and whether we're the right fit.